A New D.A.R.E. Dawning
The Dallas Morning News
BYLINE: Michael A. Lindenberger
One of the most popular weapons in America's
long-running war against drugs is being recalibrated, and the changes planned
for D.A.R.E. have drawn support from critics and fans of the program among
northeast Tarrant County police officers. 'From my own experience, I never
cared for D.A.R.E., but now that they are changing the way they implement it, I
might be interested in looking at their curriculum again,' said community
services Officer Chris Almonrode of the Roanoke Police Department.
Although D.A.R.E. officials say the program
works, Officer Almonrode is not alone in his reservations about Drug Abuse
Resistance Education. The program, developed in Los Angeles in the 1980s as a
way to introduce police officers into public schools, is the largest drug education
program in the country. It operates in 80 percent of American school districts
and 50 percent of those in Texas.
Though there is some variation, the program
has traditionally focused on fifth-graders and always involves a uniformed
officer teaching students about drug and alcohol risks. Among other things, the
students are taught to 'just say no' in the 17-week course.
When it is taught correctly, the program
works wonders, said Officer Michael Price, 33, of the Richland Hills Police
Department. 'I have never met a person who sat through a D.A.R.E. class and
wasn't impressed,' Officer Price said. 'I think the people who criticize it
don't know what they are talking about. It really bothers me. ... All they do
is criticize.
One of the most often cited studies
criticizing D.A.R.E was published in 1999 by University of Kentucky
psychologist Dr. Ronald Lynam. 'Project D.A.R.E. may be one of the most popular
drug education programs in the country, but a new study finds the program has
no long-term effect on drug use,' said a news release by the American
Psychological Association touting Dr. Lynam's study. His study concluded that
10 years after taking D.A.R.E., graduates of the program were no less likely to
use drugs than nonparticipants.
Dave Williams, executive director of the
Texas D.A.R.E. Institute, said the curriculum has been revised at least twice
since the students monitored by the University of Kentucky study participated.
Some findings
He said more recent research - including a
survey of 2,734 Texas ninth-graders - supports his belief that D.A.R.E. helps
kids stay off drugs. Among the findings:
*D.A.R.E. graduates were 14.3 percent more
likely to have had only 'low drug involvement,' meaning they did not use drugs
anymore and that any experimentation had been mild.
*Nongraduates of the program were 39.2
percent more likely to report 'high drug involvement' at the time of the
survey.
Tom Fleps, 12, a sixth-grader at Durham
Intermediate School in Southlake, said his D.A.R.E. experience in fifth grade
was great. 'We got to miss math class,' he said with a smile, before adding
that the course also reinforced his desire to stay away from drugs. His friend
and classmate, Jonathan Howle, 12, said the class was especially strong in its
emphasis on what can happen to drug users. 'I remember the talk about the
consequences and the dangers,' he said.
The new curriculum will target
ninth-graders, rather than elementary school students. It will become more
interactive, D.A.R.E. officials said, and officers will lecture less and
'coach' more.
The curriculum , to be tested among 80
schools, was developed by the Institute for Health and Social Policy at the
University of Akron. The pilot programs will be funded by a $ 13.7 million
grant from the Robert Woods Johnson Foundation of Princeton, N.J.
Southlake bond broker John Howle, Jonathan's
father, said that he understands the new focus on older kids - ninth-graders
are more likely to begin experimenting, he said - but that he hopes officials
don't discontinue the classes for elementary students. 'You have to focus on
the problem before it is a problem, too,' Mr. Howle said.
D.A.R.E. officials say they will not
discontinue the education program for elementary students, even as they shift
their focus to high school freshman.
Still, even stalwart D.A.R.E. defenders such
as Mr. Williams said they welcome D.A.R.E. officials' decision to focus on
older students. 'What it amounts to is we were getting into a shouting match
with researchers - some say it works and some evaluators say it doesn't work,'
he said. Mr. Williams said a turning point came at a conference of
policy-makers and drug education experts in Washington, D.C. in 1998, Mr.
Williams said.
Broad reach
Officials from the Robert Johnson Woods
Foundation and other experts in drug-use prevention agreed that D.A.R.E.
delivered its anti-drug messages to more students than any organization in the
country, he said.
'They said one thing that we had going for
us is that we had very strong replication of the program. The second thing we
had is a very extensive network throughout the country,' Mr. Williams said.
He said officials decided then to be open to
changing their message. 'D.A.R.E. said, 'If you've got a better message for us
to give then let us have it, because our goal is to make a difference to the
kids.' And the [foundation] came back and said, 'Why don't you deliver this
[new] program instead of what you are doing?''
Officer Price has been teaching D.A.R.E. since 1995, and he and Mr. Williams each said that such a program can't make kids avoid using drugs. Pressures to use, they said, are everywhere. 'We asked this one girl who had gotten in trouble, 'Hey where did we go wrong?' And she said, 'There is nothing you can do to make me not try drugs. You can't stop that. ... But what I did know, the minute I did it, is that I made a terrible mistake.' She told me that that saved her life,' Officer Price said. 'If it wasn't for that fact, I would not be involved in this program. I am not going to waste my life. It is what lets me go to sleep at night.'